Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Latest Dealer-Cheat Casino Scam nets seven-felony convictions at MotorCity Casino in Detroit

Bust Out Casino-Cheat Team
In another cheating-dealer/cohorts casino scam, seven people were convicted for a relatively small casino scam on an ultimate Texas hold’em table at the MotorCity casino in Detroit, Michigan. In a casino that sees tons of low-level amateurish casino-cheat scams, this one was no different.

Cheating dealer Darryl Green simply, and systematically, overpaid his six cheating accomplices’ winning bets and refrained from taking their losing bets. It´s not clear exactly how long the scam went on, but apparently in only netted a few thousand dollars, not a helluva lot for staining your record with a felony.

The scenario of cheating dealers working in collusion with their cohorts is becoming more and more prevalent as new casinos keep cropping up all over both in urban and rural parts of the United States.

It is my opinion that casinos need to educate their dealers and floor staffs via game protection training that this type of behavior is both wrong and extremely injurious to both people’s professional and personal lives.

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Back in the Days When I Could Have a Good Session...

I assume that most of my loyal readers memorize everyone one of my blog posts.  You do do that, right?  But for the one or two of you who don’t, I will refer you back to the post here from last December.  Now that post was about a session from a year earlier.  And in it, I mentioned that I had then recently discovered a number of “nice” sessions from that time period that I had never written up for you and hoped to present to you in the future.  Well, the future is now—at least for one more of them.

There were a couple of reasons for me to go back and grab a report from the not so recent past.  For one thing, with my trips to Vegas having been reduced both in frequency and in length, I’m running out of recent material.  But also, I was getting tired of writing up losing sessions as I have mostly done lately.  I remembered that I had some old sessions that I thought were worthy of blogging about, and that most likely meant they were winning sessions.

And then I started to wonder if maybe I could learn something reviewing a report on a old session.  Clearly my results lately have been disappointing, to say the least. I’ve been getting some great feedback from you guys on where I need to improve (so many areas!).  And I also got one comment that I wasn’t playing the way I used to.  Maybe I could find something important from an old session that would make me go, “Damn, why don’t I do that anymore?” So I was digging for information that maybe could help more as much as anything.

Reviewing this session I’m writing up, which took place around Christmas time in 2014, I don’t think I found anything that will help.  Except that just revisiting (and then reporting on) a session where I had a nice win might help me with my confidence a bit (possibly) and at least will be more fun to write about.  So here we go….

The first hand I made note of was against a guy with a big stack who I said (in my voice notes) looked familiar.  Based on the description I had for him, I think I now know who this player is, a player who became an MGM regular I ran into a lot during the heyday of the MGM Invitational. (freeroll).  I dunno how many times I mentioned him by “name” but I did call him “Dave” when I needed him to have a name.  So let’s assume this was that Dave.

In this hand, I had Jack-10 in the big blind.  No raise.  The flop was Queen-9-x.  I checked, Dave made a small bet. Another player called, as did I. The turn was a King, and there were now two cards of the same suit each on the board (and I had no cards in either suit).  I checked.  I wish I had explained to myself in my notes why I checked there with the nuts, but I didn’t.  It’s possible that I was, by this time, pretty sure that Dave would bet.  But it remains a mystery.  Dave did fire, a bet of $27.  The next guy called.  With two flush draws out there, I check-raised to $100 (guess I started the hand near my original buy-in of $200, and as I indicated, Dave had me covered).  Dave then shoved, the other guy folded, and I snap called.  Dave had Jack-10 too, but his was suited in one of the suits on the board.  So he had a freeroll.  Either he hits his flush and takes the whole pot, or he misses and we chop with the same straight.

Lucky for me, he missed his flush, and we chopped it.  Phew.  But Dave did ask the guy who folded if he would have called if he only called my $100 instead of shoving?  He said he would not have.

I raised to $8 with pocket 7’s and got only one call, the guy on my immediate left.  The flop was 7-4-2, rainbow.  I checked, as did he.  The turn was a Jack, no flush possible.  I bet $10 and got a call.  The river was a 7.  I bet $30 but didn’t get a call.  It’s tough to get paid for quads.


A few hands later I raised to $8 with pocket Jacks.  Same guy was the only caller.  The flop was Jack-4-2 (too bad no one was playing the Grump on either of these hands).  I checked, as did he (guess I was more into slow-playing sets back then).  A 9 on the turn and I bet $10, he called.  Another 9 on the river, I bet $25.  No call.

From the small blind, I completed with Jack-8.  The flop was 9-7-3.  I called a $5 bet. There were still three of us left.  A 10 on the turn filled in my gut-shot.  I led out for $25 and got a call.  The river was a blank and I didn’t get a call to my $40 bet.

After winning a small pot with Ace-Queen (raise and a c-bet on an Ace-high board), I looked down at pocket Aces.  I opened to $8 and then someone three-bet to $21.  It folded back to me, I bet $48.  He called, it was heads up.  Harmless looking board of 8-7-2.  I bet $75 and he folded after tanking for a bit.  He showed two Queens.

With pocket Queens myself, I called $10, it was three-ways.  The flop was King-Jack-5, I called $30, the last guy shoved for $67.  The original raiser called, but I folded.  Probably shouldn’t have called the $30.  The shover showed King-Jack, which looked real good when a Jack hit the river.  The original raiser never showed.

With the dreaded pocket Kings, I opened to $8, only one caller, a guy who was a bit of a Crazian.  The flop was Queen-high, I bet $12, he made it $40.   Hmm.  I thought he could easily do that with just a Queen.  I called.  We both checked a blank turn.  Interesting.  The river paired a 7.  He bet $60.  I tanked.  I almost folded.  But I had a hard time believing the second 7 helped him and if he was that strong without it, why didn’t he bet the turn?  I decided I had to call.  As soon as I put my chips out, he folded instantly without me even having to show.  Guess he didn’t even have a Queen!

Wouldn’t you know it, not very many hands later, I got Kings again.  After a couple of limpers, I made it $12, two callers.  The flop was King-6-5, two diamonds (no diamonds for me).  I bet $25 and got a call.  The turn was another 5.  Nice.  This time I checked behind the other guy.  Hmm….does it make sense to check there if the other player has already checked?  Well, I figured he would likely bet something on the river, based on his play thus far.  Sure enough, on a meaningless river, he led out for $25.  I put out $65 which put him all in, and he did call.  He didn’t just muck (without showing) when he saw my boat—he left the poker room. 

Now if you’re one of those wondering how it is I would take so long to write up a session where I had pocket Kings twice (within a very short time frame) and won with them both times (including a flopped set and a turned boat), you have to get in line behind me.  I can’t believe it myself.  Should have written this blog post before going to sleep that nite!

There was annoying guy at the table for a brief period.  Announced that he had just gotten into town from Oregon.  He announced that repeatedly.  He mentioned it again when he said he had forgotten the drinks are free in Vegas because they’re not in Oregon.  He was one of those guys who just wouldn’t stop talking.

His very first hand, there had been a raise to $10, two callers, and he immediately announced “all-in.” He had bought in for $100. No one called, and he said, “Well, look at what I got on my first hand!” And he showed us his hand.  Was it Aces?  Kings?  Jacks?  Nope, he showed us two deuces.  He complained that people weren’t calling his wild bets and eventually got a table change.

I only noted one more hand for myself.  It was Ace-King, I raised, two callers.  No one called my flop bet on a King-high board.

When I cashed out, I was up $380. Oh, for the good ol’ days.

Another Double Whammy Casino Cheat Bust in Singapore!

Singapore Casino-Cheat Candy Store
It never ceases to amaze me how much cheatng is going on in Singapore's two big casinos. They've been at it six years now, but it seems that Singapore is still the haven of the world for poker cheats and casino cheats, both pros and amateurs alike.

Last week there were two major casino cheating busts, but don't forget that for each bust you hear about, there are several successful casino scams that have been paid and forgotten about.

The first casino-cheating bust occured at the Marina Bay Sands casino, where another cheating dealer was overpaying his four cohorts on several different table games over a long period of time--to the tune of $118,000. These simple and amateurish overpaying-winning-bets scams are getting more and more popular, not only in Singapore but worldwide, including Las Vegas.

It blows my mind that these types of scams can go on for so long. Several times over the past year the total take from this scam has exceeded a million dollars. This shows how weak in general casinos across the world are in the area of table game protection.

When I conduct undercover surveillance for casinos, I always find evidence of the same things--lack of proper dealing procedure and basic ignorance of casino game protection.

The second Singapore bust also occured at the Marina Bay Sands. This one appeared a bit more professional but also probably involved corrupt casino employees (it seems Singapore's casinos have hordes of 'em).

This time it was three men and three females, otherwise four Russians, a Filipino and a czech (quite a strange mix of a casino-cheat team), who used electronic devices to beat the casino's slot machines. I don't have details as to exactly what devices they used or how they beat the slot machines, but all six were arrested while a laptop, sixteen cell phones and $125,000 cash were seized.

So it must have been a pretty big and maybe even professional operation.

In any case, I think it's fair to say that Singapore has become the number-one candy store for worldwide casino cheats, surpassing even Foxwoods casino in Connecticut.

I spoke at the Aces Casino Summit in Singapore just two years before the country's two casinos opened in 2009.

I urged them to get proper game protection training for their employees--obviously they still haven't listened.

I have never been contacted by either Singapore casiono to help them out.

Saturday, May 21, 2016

Should Convicted Online Poker Cheat Darren Woods be Inducted into the RMB Poker and Casino Cheats Hall of Fame?

Poker Cheats Hall of Fame Material?

Professional poker player Darren Woods, who won a bracelet at the 2011 World Series of Poker, really took online multiple-hands poker-play to new heights when he set up multiple fake identities on different private online networks to conceal his domination of countless online poker tables during at least a six-year period from 2006 to 2012.

He created some 60 different accounts, which gave him a huge advantage against honest players playing alone. In fact, he had a sizeable advantage against even normal online poker collusion syndicates.  

Woods’ main online poker room for his scams was 888.com, the site that once hired and trusted him as one of their sponsored players to represent the brand. He was eventually caught by other online poker players who grew suspicious of his exorbitant win-rates. He was then tried in court in the UK, and became one of the few persons ever sentenced to prison for online gambling cheating, be it poker or casino games.

No one knows for sure how much Woods earned with his huge online poker cheat-scam, although some estimates put it at more than $ 15 million. The presiding judge at his trial sentenced him to 15 months in the slammer and a fine of $ 1.25 million, with a threat of six years’ more prison-time if he didn’t make good on it.

At the end, after several denials of his online poker crimes, Woods admitted he’d done it—but with a huge mitigating circumstance: other players had cheated online for huge sums of money and never got prosecuted.

Talk about lame excuses!

So, is Darren Woods a good candidate for the RMB Poker and Casino Cheats Hall of Fame?

I would think so.

Another former successful WSOP player who went on to mastermind a major online poker scam is already in the Poker and Casino Cheats Hall of Fame. Of course I’m talking about Russ Hamilton, the famous 1994 WSOP Main Event champ and infamous mastermind of the huge $30 million UltimateBet online poker scandal in the early 2000s.

And recently inducted to the cheating Hall is Phil Ivey, another WSOP bracelet winner, although his poker cheating occurred in brick and mortar casinos.


I think we will eventually see Darren Woods in the Cheats Hall of Fame—just a matter of time.

Thursday, May 19, 2016

Not The Start I Wanted

This is going to be another one of those boring posts with a lot of hand histories.  Sorry about that, but you have been warned.

This was my first nite in Vegas last month, a visit to MGM.  My very first hand was Jack-10 of hearts.  Now that is a starting hand I usually play and almost always raise with if the pot hasn’t been raised to me first.  On the other hand, I always play very tight (even by my standards) when I first sit down, preferring to get a feel for the table before mixing it up—unless I get something I have to play, like a big pocket pair or Ace-King.  So my first thought was to just fold and see what was going on with this table.  Then I thought, no, you can at least limp in with it.  Then I thought, screw that.  I was in the hijack seat and it had folded to me.  If I raised, I might not see a flop and perhaps raising with my very first hand might give me an image I don’t usually have.

So I made it $8. And everyonebehind me called.  It was actually pretty funny.  We were now five to see the flop, which was Jack-10-5, rainbow. Cool.  I bet $25 and had two callers.  I wasn’t thrilled with the King on the turn but I put out $60 and didn’t get a call.

So after one hand, I was ahead for the trip.  Considering how my last trip went, I have to say the thought of standing up, cashing out, and turning right around and going home so I could call this a profitable trip did cross my mind.  But only as a joke.  Of course I played on.

Sometime later, still with a little bit of profit in front of me, I raised to $8 in late position with King-Jack of clubs.  Three of us saw a flop of Ace-3-2, two clubs (the little cards; the Ace was a heart).  Before I could c-bet a guy led out for $15.  The other player folded and I called.  The turn was good news/bad news.  It was the Ace of clubs.  So I had the nut flush but certainly not the nuts.  This time he bet $40 and I called.  The river was a blank, and I was a bit surprised to see him check.

As observant readers of my blog know, my default here is to check behind and see if my flush is good.  I started to do that and then I reminded myself how I should be value betting the river a lot more often than I do to try to get more money for my made hands.  This is a huge leak in my game.  So I thought about the action.  And I realized that there was just no way this guy, after donk-betting the flop and betting the turn, would be checking the river with a boat.  Just no way.  I mean, yeah, I suppose he could be trying to induce a bluff from me, but I just couldn’t see it. I was certain he would bet if he had me beat.  More likely he had a lesser flush or maybe trip Aces.  If he had those, he might call a bet with them.  I put out $60.  He tanked for a bit, but ultimately folded.

Still, I was happy that I bet.  It was a small victory overcoming my natural tendency to play it too damn safe.  Maybe he would have called a smaller bet.  But if he had, I’d be thinking, “He would have called more.”  At least I pulled the trigger.

I was up nearly $100 when my buddy Mike pushed in. Now Mike is famous for cracking my Kings—he was doing it long before it became a thing for me—but this time he didn’t have to give me the dreaded hand to ruin my evening.

In early position he sent me Ace-King off.  I made it $8 and the guy behind me made it $25.  The next player, an Indian fellow who had played very few hands since sitting down, called.  Two more players called.  So of course I called.  Although, with five people willing to see a flop for $25, I’m not sure what kind of flop I’d really like.

Certainly not the one we got, which was Jack-high. I checked, the preflop aggressor put out a good sized bet, and then the Indian announced all-in.  Hmm….he had a bit over $150 or so.  Everyone folded, including me, until it got back to the preflop aggressor, who wasted no time in calling (he had the guy covered).  I was thinking that the Indian must have had a set of Jacks—that would make total sense.  But no, he turned over two Aces!  The other guy meekly turned over two Queens.  He was shocked, as was everyone else, that Indian hadn’t four-bet with his Aces.  Nothing hit the turn or the river and the guy with the Aces had a nice pot. But boy, did he play that oddly.  I suppose you could say it was smart—if he four-bets preflop, he’s basically turning his hand face up, especially since he hadn’t played many hands.  And then by shoving any flop, it’s maybe his best chance at a double up.  But there’s a huge risk that someone hits a better hand.  And of course, he couldn’t know that it would be five players to see the flop.  So I can’t say if the guy was clueless or brilliant.  But in this case, it sure worked.

Mike wouldn’t deal me pocket Kings so he sent me two black Aces instead.  I raised to $8 and had three callers.  The flop was King-high and all hearts.  I dutifully put out $25.  Anyone think I shouldn’t bet there (or maybe less?).  Two folds, and then the last guy—also the last guy to call my bet preflop from the blind—check-raised all in for $125 or so.  I folded.  He showed his hand, Queen-2 of hearts, so he could get a drawing ticket for his flopped flush. 

Then Mike dealt me two Jacks.  After a limper, I made it $12.  The guy on my left called, it folded to the limper, an older gentleman from Houston.  He announced “all-in.”  But he only had $28 total.  So I called and the other guy called.  The flop was Queen-9-7, rainbow.  Hmm….Well, I’m basically heads up against the guy with a big stack.  I figured the odds were against him having a Queen so I bet $40.  But the guy behind me shoved.  He had me covered (we both started with over $150 or so).  I shrugged and figured I was beat, so I folded.  The turn was another Queen, and the river was a brick.  The old guy turned over pocket Kings.  Clearly, Mike intended to give me those Kings and missed by one seat.  He took the pot, but the other guy had already claimed the $40 I bet on the flop with his shove.  And he showed 9-7.  He said, “I only played it because it’s my lucky hand.”  No, he was not The Trooper.

So I made a good fold, and I really don’t think my flop bet was a bad idea (agree/disagree?). Of course, had I called his shove, I would have won the side pot when the Queen on the turn counterfeited his hand.  But that’s results-oriented thinking.

That was pretty much the end of the (mildly) interesting hands.  I noted one more hand, when I raised with Ace-Jack and took down a three-way with a c-bet on a Queen-high flop.

All told, what started out as a promising night ended up with a $100 loss.  My trip was not off to the positive start I had hoped for.  These losing sessions are starting to drive me to drink……


Tuesday, May 17, 2016

How Much Do You Bet With a Set of Aces?

Saturday I went to Player’s Casino in Ventura to toss some cards and chips around.  Otherwise known as playing poker.

The goal was to get out of the house, have some fun, and see if I could manage to come up with a winning session, something that has been all too rare of late.

When I got there, the list for the 2/3 game was quite long, but within minutes of adding my name to it, they called a new game, and I was last person on it to get in.

The game was a little chaotic and wild to start out.  As often happens with a new table at PC, a number of the players in this game were really waiting for a seat at a bigger game—either the PLO game or the 3/5 NL game.  So they were a little more aggro than the average regular 2/3 player.  The first couple of pots played out huge and there had been no limping. Three-betting preflop had been the rule, so when I looked down at Ace-King in early position before the first orbit had been completed, I momentarily considered limping, waiting for someone else to raise.  But no, I did indeed raise, and waited to see how much the three-bet would be.

But my raise to $12 was only called—by two players—not raised.  The flop was ugly. Queen-Jack-Jack.  Well, I did have a gutshot to Broadway.  I held my breath and put out $25.  Only one player called.  The turn was a deuce, no help.  I checked, giving up on the hand.  I was a bit surprised that the other guy checked behind.  My play smelled of exactly what it was—c-bet. a missed flop and then giving up when he called.  This player was one of the ones waiting for the 3/5 game, too.  The river was a 3.  I thought about it and decided to bet it.  The guy’s check on the turn showed bigger weakness, in my eyes, than my turn check had.  And I had a hard time believing the 3 helped him.  I figured what the hell and counted out $35 and bet it.  He folded quite quickly.  Cool.

Not long after I had Ace-Queen and opened to $13 (meant to put out $12 and grabbed an extra dollar chip by mistake).  Again, two callers.  This time the flop was a little more boring, just Jack high.  I tried a $25 c-bet and won my second pot of the day.

After about 20 minutes, they opened a new 3/5 game and all hell broke loose.  Three players from our table left to join the bigger game and everybody at my table left decided to change seats.  For about five minutes, it was like a Chinese fire drill as everyone claimed new seats, and a couple of players who came in new played a hand or two and then moved to another game as well.  Luckily, the list for our game was long and they didn’t have any trouble filling up our table.

I was happy to see the guy on my immediate left take off.  For one thing, he straddled my big blind every time. Also, he was annoying.  He liked to discuss the hands afterward—recreate them—in great detail.  All while the next hand was going on.  I was trying to follow the current hand and he was talking about who raised on the turn on the previous hand.  I really don’t like playing next to a guy who thinks he’s Norman Chad.

One of the seats was taken by a middle-aged woman.  Perhaps middle-aged is a tad generous.  She sure didn’t look like a poker player.  But if we thought she was going to be some timid nit, we were in for a rude awakening.  She played pretty crazy.  Her first few raises (of many) were huge--$25, $20.  Eventually she made smaller raises, and limped a decent amount of the time.  But folding preflop was not anything she liked to do except on rare occasions.  A lot of times she took pots with aggressive play, but when we were able to see her hand we some odd cards.  Her stack fluctuated quite a bit. 

One time when she had fallen below $100, she open shoved.  The fellow on her left had commented to a few of us on her play when she was away from the table earlier.  None of us could really figure her out.  Anyway, that guy raised to $200.  That got everyone to fold, which was his plan.  He showed his hand—pocket Jacks.  She showed her hand—Queen-3 offsuit (she wasn’t a lot below $100 so it was a totally horrific play on her part).  Of course, she caught a Queen on the turn and took the pot.

This lady was responsible for one of the more unusual things I’d seen in a poker room.  By the time this happened, she had gotten to the point where she was limping a bit more frequently than she was raising.  There was one limper and then she put out three yellow chips (in this casino, as in the Bike, the $5 chips are yellow, the $1 chips are blue).  She went oops and somehow indicated that she hadn’t meant to do that.  The dealer said, “You meant to just call?”  She said she grabbed the yellow chips by mistake, she thought they were the blue ones.  The dealer said, to everyone, “Is it ok with everyone if she takes it back and just calls?”  I didn’t think that was allowed, at least not as it occurred there. Has anyone ever seen a player raise and then be allowed to take it back?  Or allow a vote of the players to decide if a bet is a bet?  But no one objected and she limped instead. Someone else raised, the hand went to showdown and on the river, she went all-in.  The only player left was the same guy on her left.  He tanked and folded and said, “Well, you’ve got to show your hand….we gave you that break.”  But she acted like she didn’t hear him and sent the cards back to the dealer face down.  The guy, a friendly, jocular fellow, said, “OK, next time, we’re not giving you any breaks.”

Meanwhile, I had fallen into my recent pattern of being incredibly card dead.  I barely played another hand for a long time.  I realized at one point that I hadn’t seen a single pocket pair the entire time I was there.  Not a big pair, not a little pair, and nothing in between.  Nada.  I had maybe seen one medium suited connector and Ace-Queen once or twice that didn’t go anywhere.  I actually looked at my watch to see how long I’d been there.  It was about an hour and 45 minutes.  Seems like a long time to go without a pair.

Just a few minutes after I had done that calculation, I looked down and saw a pocket pair, finally.  And wouldn’t you know, it was a couple of Aces.  Worth waiting for—I hoped.  A couple of people limped in front of me so I made it $18.   Only one player called—the guy I mentioned who was on the lady’s left.  He had been one of the limpers.  The flop was totally innocuous and he checked.  I started to grab some chips and before I could count them, he folded.  But then he turned over his cards—two Jacks.  “I assume these are no good?”  I was a bit surprised, why had he originally limped in with Jacks?  Note: This hand occurred before the hand when he had raised the lady’s all-in to $200 with Jacks.  Still this guy had been reasonable aggressive, and had put in more than his share of preflop raises.  I couldn’t believe Jacks weren’t in his preflop raising range.

So I actually said to him, “Surprised you didn’t raise with those.”  He misunderstood what I meant and said, “No….I wasn’t going to re-pop you with Jacks.”  I got that—it was the first time I’d raised in at least an hour.  I said, “No I mean you limped in with pocket Jacks, I wouldn’t have expected that.”  He just shrugged, said, “Yeah, I limped.”  Ok, I can’t blame him for not giving away his strategy, I wouldn’t have either.

That didn’t exactly open of the floodgates for me, card-wise.  I did get Ace-King again, and won a two way pot with a raise and a c-bet.

Then I just checked with King-Queen offsuit in the big blind. I bet $5 on a King-high flop and got a caller.  I bet $15 on a blank turn and got a call.  The river put a third heart out there and I checked.  Instead of checking behind me, the other player just mucked his cards.  Strange.  That annoyed the same guy who had limped with Jacks earlier.  He said, “Why didn’t you check, I wanted to see his hand?” He meant my hand.  Somehow, this guy had gotten particularly interested in how I was playing.

In the big blind I had 7-3 of hearts and there was no raise.  It was just three of us.  The flop was Queen-5-4, one heart (the 5). I checked and the next guy bet $10.  The other guy folded and I decided to see one more card, so I called.  I was kind of hoping for the 6 of hearts but I wasn’t too sorry to see the 6 of spades instead.  From his play all day, I expected this guy to bet, so I checked.  He didn’t disappoint and put out $20.  Of course I knew that 8-7 beat me, but I dismissed the possibility.  I couldn’t see him playing that the way he did.  I was pretty sure he had a Queen and not really a strong one.  I thought about betting smaller, but decided my check-raise would be to $60.  He took some time to call, but did.

The turn was a 9, no flush possible, and still 8-7 was the nuts.  I went over it in my mind again, and still was convinced he didn’t have the nuts.  I put out $100, which I suppose was too much (but the pot was around $140).  He tanked for a long, long time.  He took a stack of $100, put it close to the betting line, but not over.  And finally, he folded.

Before I relinquished my hand, the guy who had limped with Jacks spoke up.  “I’ll give you seven bucks if you show me anything other than 7-8.”  I laughed.  Now by this time, I was almost ready to call it a day.  So I figured what the hell and flipped my cards over.  The guy said, “Well….almost the same thing.”  But sure enough, the tossed me seven $1 chips.  I laughed. But I actually didn’t feel right about taking them….even though he had committed to it and I had taken him up on it.  After all, “verbal is binding.”  Still, it felt wrong.  I said, “I can’t take this.” and tried to give them back to him.  He said, “Well, here, at least I’ll post your small blind for you.”  So he put two of them back for my small blind.

My initial $300 stack had grown past $350 despite being so card dead.  And I decided that this was going to be my last or second to last orbit.  And I still hadn’t gotten a second pocket pair yet.

I got nothing until, in early position I got my second pocket pair of the day.  Two black Aces.  Well, I guess if you’re going to only get pockets twice in a session, that’s the pair to get, right?

I opened the pot to $15.  And promptly got three callers, including the guy so fascinated with my play.  He was the big blind.  I didn’t really want to play my Aces against three other players, surely someone would hit something.

Well, someone did.  Me. The flop was Ace-6-3, two diamonds.  The big blind checked and I had to decide how to play it.


Here’s where I’d like your input.  I’m certainly not checking there, not with the diamonds out there. For that matter, any of the players in the hand could have called my raise with 5-4, especially if it was suited.  If it was two or three-handed, I would probably go with a 2/3’s or 3/4’s pot size bet.

But three others in the hand gave me pause.  I wasn’t about to do anything crazy like shove to make sure no flush draw called me.  I’ve seen my opponents do that many, many times.  But I sure as hell didn’t want to make it easy for anyone to call, or for more than one player to call.  I tanked for a bit and decided that, if I was going to lose with a set of Aces, I was damn sure going to give them bad odds to hit it.  I went with $60—a pot sized bet.  Well, I guess a little bit more than pot-sized, when you take out the rake.

The first guy mucked instantly.  But the next guy went into the tank.  He was a youngish Asian guy, but he had not played anything like the kind of “Crazian” you see in Vegas.  He was actually a pretty tight player.   After a few minutes, when it really looked like he was going to call….he mucked.  My buddy, the big blind, folded immediately.

Now I was just a hand or two from leaving, so again, out of character for me, I showed my hand.  That got a few oohs and ahhs.  The Asian didn’t say what he had but said he assumed I had Ace-King, Ace-Queen and thought that he could maybe steal the pot on the turn if the right card came up.

But I ask you, what was the right bet to make there? I have to say, if anyone who had cards had a decent flush draw, I don’t think my $60 bet would have gotten them to fold. I just wanted them to be wrong for hitting it.  Let me know what the right bet was.

And a few hands later I racked up and cashed out.  It was a pretty fun table and I won some money.  My $110 profit wasn’t a lot, but it was a welcome change from the way I’ve been running lately, and I was glad to leave with more money than I came in with.

Sunday, May 15, 2016

More On Parking

Say the first two words in the title of this post fast.  As if they were in fact just one word.

You know…as in “moron parking.”

Now that the official policy regarding parking at MGM Resorts in Las Vegas has been released, I’m going to talk about it one more time.  This is, after all, “Rob’s Vegas& Poker Blog” and this is a big deal in Vegas.  I was going to talk about it some more anyway since on my most recent trip to Vegas my travels were somewhat affected by the new policy even though it still hasn’t started yet—well, it sort of hasn’t started yet.

I discussed the decision by MGM Resorts to start charging for parking at all their Vegas resorts here and here.  But that was largely based on hearsay, rumor and innuendo.  Now I have some actual facts.

Those posts were written after my March trip but before The T-Mobile arena had opened.  When I returned in April, the arena was open, as was “The Park,” a little outdoor, park-like area between New York New York and Monte Carlo.  It is accessible from the Strip.  I guess it’s sort of like the Linq promenade, but smaller and maybe a bit more pastoral.  It’s nice enough, but it is clearly not aimed at someone like me.  Aside from some grass and some trees, it is made up mostly of (presumably) overpriced places to eat and drink.

The arena, from the outside, resembles a place where you’d see a basketball or hockey game.  And in fact, it is big enough to host an NHL team, and they are trying like crazy to actually land an NHL club.  It sounds like it is likely to happen.  Because, if being in the middle of the desert doesn’t make you think of ice hockey, what does?

By the way, they have already picked out a name for the NHL team, assuming they get one.  It’ll be The Las Vegas Black Knights.  Seriously?  That strikes me as a bad name.  I had already thought of the perfect name for a Las Vegas hockey team.  They should call it the Las Vegas Aces.  Imagine their games with the L.A. Kings—Aces vs. Kings.  The Aces will always be 80-20 favorites. 

The arena will also host concerts, fights, exhibition basketball games, and who knows what else.  Right now, the Lakers (and the aforementioned Kings) play an exhibition game or two every year at MGM in the Grand Garden, I imagine the T-Mobile arena will now host those.

On nights when they have a big event there, it will bring a lot of traffic to the corner of Tropicana and the Strip.  There’s already a lot of traffic there now.  Should be fun. 

So they built this arena, and, originally, they didn’t build any additional parking structures for it.  They said that the garages in the casinos nearby (all MGM properties) would provide ample parking for the new venue. (I’ve since learned they are working on another garage behind Excalibur to provide more parking).

Now at any other place in the country—or the world, I guess—you would expect to pay for parking at big sports/concert venue like this.  I have no idea what it costs to park at Dodger Stadium or Staples Center, but I bet it’s more than a buck or two.

And thus, the justification to start charging for parking was born.  They couldn’t very well let you park in a nearby casino parking garage to see the Las Vegas Black Knights for free, could they?  Of course not.  And since there is no dedicated structure for the arena, the obvious thing to do is charge for parking at all neighboring casino garages.

To be sure, there were other reasons for them to start charging for parking.  The main one being, they could.

Originally they were going to start charging for parking at all their casinos in April, just as the arena was ready to open.  But I guess it took them longer than expected to get all the garages ready to operate as paid facilities.  So when the arena opened, just a few weeks before I got there last month, they decided to only charge for parking at some of their casinos and only when there was an event at the arena.

The report I heard was that, on event nights, it was $20 to park in the NYNY or Monte Carlo garages.  And also that some of the Aria parking was also $20.  Note: If you knew to “reserve” a parking spot, you could get the space for only $10 by paying in advance.

My understanding (which may be wrong, I admit) was that if you wanted to go to any of those places on a night when they had an event, even if it was just to gamble or eat in the casino, you’d be charged twenty bucks to exit!

As I’ve mentioned, frequently when I got to MGM, I find it more convenient to park at NYNY.  Also, when I go to Aria, I find it easier to park at Monte Carlo.  Why?  Well, you can’t get to the Aria self-parking without driving on the Vegas Strip. I hate driving on the Vegas Strip.  I take great pains to avoid it.  Usually, I’m pretty successful.  I think I know all the back roads and back routes to get to the places and the structures I need without driving on the Strip. And guess what? I can get to the Monte Carlo parking structure without driving on the Strip. 

So, it was incumbent on me to check the T-Mobile schedule first before deciding to try to park at either NYNY or MC.  Actually, it turned out I was there such a brief time they didn’t have events while I was there.  But I still was affected by the new parking rules.

I encountered this before in March, but the NYNY parking structure was still in the process of being converted to “enhanced parking.”  Yes, that’s what they’re calling it, as a way of charging you for it.  I suspect they will eventually be featuring “enhanced toilet paper” in the restrooms that they can charge you for.  There were enough floors being worked on (repaved, re-stripped, adding those generally worthless lights telling you whether or not a space is open) that I just ended up parking on the roof both times I parked there.  I imagine when there’s a big event, event, those spaces I saw on the roof might all be filled.

Parking at MGM itself the one time I did was more frustrating.  Hadn’t been in the lot since early January.  Well, I entered from where I usually do.  And I tried my little “shortcut” to get to the back of the garage so I can easily reach the upper levels without encountering any traffic.  Well, there was no sign warning me but my access to the upper ramps was completely closed off.  I had no choice but to exit the garage right back onto the street and double back.  I was not happy.

While doing that, I noticed a huge lineup of cars trying to exit the structure.  This was like at level 4 or 5 so that was a lot of cars backed up a long way.  And this was before anyone had to pay to exit (or put a paid ticked in a machine).  It was likely due to there being so many exits closed that they were forced to use only one.  In case you’ve never seen it, the MGM garage is a huge muther-effing garage. I was almost stuck in the traffic of the exiters even though I was entering.  Fortunately, when I exited myself, there was just a minimal back up.

Now I attribute this to the work they are doing on the garages.  In other words, it is just temporary.  Hopefully, all the floors and all the exits will be operational next time I’m there.

But it did give me a sneak peak at what will likely happen on a busy night.  With every car having to stop, and either pay, put a ticket in a machine, or swipe a card to get the gate open, traffic leaving any MGM venue is going to back up.  That should be a lot of fun.  It is one of the penalties everyone will pay for this new parking policy, even if you don’t have to pay for parking.

Anyway, that was my experience in April. I already mentioned that in March I saw the kiosks installed in some of the lots (most notably NYNY and MC) that would be used to collect the money.


But the complete details of how the fees would work weren’t revealed until the end of last week.  It started with an email sent to all MLife cardholders who live in Vegas (or maybe all of Nevada?).  I didn’t get one but a copy was forwarded to me.  It mostly covered the topic of fees for locals.  And it explained that Nevada residents would be entitled to free parking through the end of the year, even as they were going to start charging everyone else starting in early June.  Starting next year, Nevada residents will be on their own, presumably, just like the rest of us.  Oh, but there will be no free parking, even no, for locals on “Event Nights” at the nearest casino garages to the arenas.

Amusing note (to me anyway):  The person who signed the email has the title of “Chief Experience Officer.”  That is certainly a title I’d never heard of before.  Does this mean there are a bunch of not as powerful “Experience Officers” reporting to this person?  And how much experience is required to be a Chief Experience Officer?

Anyway, of more importance to non-locals, such as myself, was the link they provided which finally revealed all the details of the new parking rules.  The link is here and I suggest you click on it and explore around before reading much further in this post. And be sure to check out the four riveting videos on that page that help explain it all. But don’t stop there.  Be sure to click on the link on that page that takes you to the Frequently Asked Questions (which is here).  There you will see no less than 67 FAQ’sthat explain it all.

If you check out both web pages, you will see one obvious problem with the new program.  It is extremely complicated.  Just as a general rule, anything that complicated, that complex….anything that needs 67 FAQ’s answered is, by definition, bad. 

One thing to notice is that, for self-parking, there are three tiers.  The first 60-minutes will actually be free.  The trouble with that is…what can you do in a casino for less than an hour?  Have you ever been inside the casinos and the parking garages at Bellagio or MGM Grand?  They are huge.  I believe that, unless you qualify for the US Olympic team as a sprinter, you probably can’t get from the garage to the center of either casino and back to your car in an hour.  OK, that is a slight exaggeration.  But I’m really not sure how much time you’d have once you actually got into the casino to do anything.

Then there is a rate for under four hours, and a rate for over four hours.  The most self-parking will cost at any resort will be $10—per entry/exit (or per day, whichever is more).  Now, if you are staying at one of the MGM resorts, they will graciously charge you only $10 per day, and you can park at any and every MGM property as many times as you like for that one low price.  If you are a registered guest, they will conveniently bill you the $10 per day to your room, just like the resort fee.

It’s pretty much the same for valet parking, though that is of course more expensive.  And there is no one hour free with the valet parking. As soon as you hand your car to the valet, you’re on the clock.

I immediately thought of one problem when I saw the program that I hadn’t thought of originally.  What if someone would like to use both the valet and self-parking at various times?  As I’ve mentioned, I never stay on the Strip any more, I stay off strip at a place designed for longer visits and that has a kitchen.  But in the past, I’ve stayed at regular hotels, both on and off the Strip.  In recent years, due mostly to my chronic back discomfort, I would use the valet when I checked in to a hotel, so I could have a bellman deal with my luggage.  And also use the valet when checking out.  It saved my back.  But the rest of the time, I would always self-park, which I prefer whenever possible.  Would I still be able to do this under the new system?

The answer is no.  Assuming I was paying for parking, I would have to decide if I wanted to valet the entire time or self-park the entire time.  There’s no going back and forth (I actually just found this in the FAQ’s). Apparently, even if I was ok with paying for Valet the whole time while using the self-park most of the time, they wouldn’t allow it.  Man, not only would that add considerably to the cost of the stay—paying at the valet rate the whole time, when I only wanted it twice during my stay—but I’d be spending a lot of money in tips for the valets.  Yeesh.

But digging into those FAQ’s I learned that at least those who are paying for parking by virtue of having a room at an MGM property won’t be charged extra during event periods. That is different from what I was told during April before the entire policy kicked in. So, if you’re staying at NYNY and come back to your hotel during the middle of a hockey game or a Billy Joel concert, you won’t have to pay an extra twenty bucks.  But you might not be able to find a parking space there!  So you might have to park at Excalibur or Luxor or MGM and walk back to your hotel.  That should prove to be popular!

Of course, there are ways to get around the parking fees.  Park at a non-MGM resort!  Or…well, as noted at the time, if you get your MLife upgraded, you can qualify for free parking for life—or until those tier credits expire.   If you increase one level from the entry level, which is “Pearl” you get free self-parking.  Another level above that, “Gold” and you get free valet parking.

As mentioned in my prior posts about this, until now you could never increase your level through just playing poker. Poker just didn’t count.  But MGM knew they had to do something for the locals who keep their rooms busy and the games going.  Even the biggest tourist rooms in town on the strip all depend on the local grinders to support their poker rooms.  Forcing the locals into other rooms by charging them to park would kill even the biggest, busiest poker rooms in town.

I mentioned how complicated the rules for parking are and how you can find everything you need to know about them at that link above.  Well not quite.  Because the rules for qualifying for higher tier levels for poker players are not written down anywhere—at least anywhere that the average person can find them.  It’s a secret.  I’m not kidding.  You will not see any MGM employee write down the rules for this.  It’s almost like you have to know the secret handshake to get the details.  You need to go to a high ranking poker room employee in one of their rooms, and whisper to them, “I’m Nunzio’s wife.” (there’s no prize, but please let me know if you understand that reference). 

I can only guess at the reasons they are keeping these rules on the QT. And in this post, I won’t guess.  But the rules are out there, spread by word-of-mouth.  And I therefore hope it’s ok for me to reveal them without risk of repercussions. I wouldn’t want to wake up with a lion’s head n my bed.  Essentially, you have to play 75 hours of live poker in an MGM property to get to Pearl for free self-parking (I assume in a year, but honestly, not sure).  And double that—150 hours—and you get to Gold, for free valet parking.  If you do all of that in a single MGM resorts room, it’s automatic.  But if you need to combine hours in more than one room to make the threshold, I assume you have to go into one of those poker rooms, ask to speak to the boss, and, again, tell them you’re Nunzio’s wife, and they will set you up.  Fortunately, in 2016, it wouldn’t be so weird for a guy to actually be Nunzio’s wife.  You won’t have to put on a dress to do this.

I also heard that tournament players can qualify if they play X number of tournaments in an MGM property in the period.  I think it was 15 (maybe 18, so don’t quote me).  I guess double that for Gold.  No idea if there’s a way to combine tournament and cash play to make it.  You might have to tell them you’re Nunzio himself to get that accomplished.

Well, yours truly has indeed qualified.  Not just for Pearl, but for Gold. I’m gold, Jerry, I’m gold! (well, I am supposed to look like Costanza). And since I got that just from playing at MGM (Grand), I didn’t need to speak to anyone.  One day I looked at my MLife benefits online and there I was…GOLD.  Hooray for me.  I can park anywhere I damn like at any MGM property and just laugh at all you schlubs who actually have to pay.

And of course the local grinders who play a fair amount in the MGM rooms will make it easily.  For them, it’s about an hour and a half of play in an MGM room per week.  Eeazy Peazy for even the mildest of Vegas poker degenerates.  But what if you prefer to play at CET rooms, or Venetian, or Wynn, and only very occasionally play at MGM rooms? Like when a buddy in town wants to play there, or there’s something else going on there everyone once in awhile that brings you there?  Hmm…could be a problem even for the locals.

But here’s what I fear. As I noted before, it’s inevitable that the other Strip properties will start charging for parking.  For one thing, they are no less greedy than the folks in charge at MGM.  They wear corporate suits too.  And also…for self-defense.  People wanting to go to Mirage will park at Venetian or Treasure Island and walk there.  They will park across the street at Bally’s to go to Bellagio.  They will park at Tropicana or Hooters to play MGM or the other MGM properties in the vicinity.  And…it’s a bit of schlep, but you can park at Planet Hollywood and walk to MGM (or to Aria).  I know, I’ve done it.  So when there’s suddenly no parking available at casinos that aren’t charging for parking for their own patrons, guess what they’re gonna do?  If you said, “Adapt a similar policy to MGM’s,” you win!

And then it will become difficult for all but the most degenerate of poker degens to qualify at all the properties to assure themselves of free parking at every place on the strip they might want to play poker.  And for yours truly, it might very well become impossible.  And even with just MGM casinos, cutting down my trips to Vegas as I have, and playing in a larger variety of rooms (most of those, non-MGM properties) means my ability to keep up my free parking privileges for a long time are shaky at best.

Of course, you can still qualify for Pearl or Gold status the old way—by playing in the pit, pouring money into the slot machines, paying for expensive meals at the MGM properties.  I dunno what the rules are for qualifying that way—I never did any of that stuff and never needed to know.  And no idea if you can combine poker play with slot and or pit play to qualify.  My guess is no, but not clear.

And I want to repeat what I’ve said previously.  I give a lot of credit to the poker room managers at the MGM properties for encouraging their bosses up the food chain to make this concession for their poker players.  I have no inside knowledge of how this came about, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some blood was spilled over this.  I only say this knowing how top casino management in general (at any casino) thinks about poker.  Which is, almost never, unless they absolutely have to.

But that concession will not help a lot of players, the non-poker players or the visitors who don’t visit often enough to play 75 hours in one chain’s rooms  Those people had better start planning on pouring money into slot machines, or putting a mortgage payment or two into a buy-in at a blackjack table.

The MGM suits point out that parking costs almost everywhere else in the country.  True enough.  But when I paid a shitload to park at a hotel in downtown Los Angeles a few years back, there was no casino where I was encouraged to lose a car payment or two at games of chance that were guaranteed to take money out of my pocket over time.  I’ve played in a bunch of different casinos in Southern California and not once did I ever have to pay to park.  I guess Atlantic City charges for parking—but is a shithole like Atlantic City something that Vegas wants to emulate?

I keep hearing that the Vegas business model has changed. They no longer make the majority of their money from gambling.  That’s why they need to make money on everything.  But to me, that’s sort of a chicken-or-egg thing.  Did gambling revenues go down all by themselves, forcing casinos to jack up the costs for everything else?  Or did they go down because people now spend so much more than they used on everything else in Vegas (food, drinks, shows, clubs, rooms, spas, etc) that they don’t have as much money as they used to gamble with?

They used to give away the store to get you to come in to play games with bad odds.  In exchange you got whatever thrill you got for gambling, knowing you’d likely lose but that there was a chance you’d sometimes come home a winner.  They still want you to do that but they also want to overcharge you for rooms, food, drinks, shows, clubs.  None of those are bargains any more.  And they now want to charge you to park for the privilege of overpaying for all those things, and of course, gamble!

Will this change affect Vegas tourism in an appreciable way?  Who knows? But let me give you a example from some people I know, my friends Woody & LM, who I’ve mentioned often.  They love Vegas but never, ever gamble.  They go to get away from the rat-race, to relax in a nice hotel room, or the bar, or by the pool in nice weather.  They like the spa.  They enjoy a few fine meals while in town.  Occasionally they see a show but are more likely to catch a movie while in town.

The last two times they went they stayed at the Aria and loved it.  They would love to go back there, the room and the amenities were all outstanding.  But when I sent them the new parking details, they told me they were never going to go back to Aria—or any MGM property again.  The resort fees they paid were bad enough, but this is where they draw the line.  They can still stay at other Strip places for now….and when that is closed off to them, they will likely stay at Red Rock or even Orleans before ever finding themselves in an MGM parking garage again.  They can certainly do pretty much everything they want to do in Vegas at the Red Rock, without ever hitting the Strip.

They can’t be the only ones who feel this way.  I mean, once people have seen the Strip, can they avoid it on their next visit and just do Vegas at a locals place (that will likely never charge for parking)?  Depends on why they come to Vegas.  They might need the Strip for a show or a night club.  But unless they have a hankering for a specific Strip restaurant, they can find good food at a lot cheaper prices elsewhere.  And you know, those locals places have slot machines and blackjack tables too.

Ironically, it’s the poker players who come to Vegas that need the Strip more than most tourists.  The games are better on the Strip than in the locals places with the nits.  That is, until the recreational poker players stop coming to Vegas because of the parking fees.

I guess we’ll just have to see how it all plays out.  Rant over (for now).  (Edited to add: Well, I did rant some more after experience the final product myself.  See here).